“Listy-Letters from the Silenced Country”, interview with director Andrei Kutsila

Listy-Letters from the Silenced Country by director Andrei Kutsila, presented at Venice Film Festival, explores the realities of contemporary Belarus through personal letters from those who have experienced repression, imprisonment, and exile. The project is included in Venice Open and sheds light on a country where freedom of expression remains severely restricted.

The significance of “Listy-Letters from the Silenced Country” in portraying Belarusian life

Kutsila emphasizes that his own forced exile following the 2020 protests deeply influenced his desire to tell stories from Belarus. With many friends still inside the country facing imprisonment or hiding, he felt a moral obligation to give voice to those silenced by the regime. The film’s focus on letters allows for an intimate glimpse into the lives of political prisoners and exiles, offering a deeper understanding beyond conventional reporting.

Using letters to access personal stories

Kutsila explains that letters serve as a bridge to the private worlds of individuals living under authoritarian rule. Unlike news reports or human rights documentation, letters reveal emotional depth and personal perspectives. He spent years exploring innovative ways to present these letters visually, aiming to preserve their intimacy while making them accessible on screen. He believes that this approach allows viewers to engage with the stories on a human level, fostering empathy and awareness about Belarus’s ongoing struggles.

The perspective of Andrei Astapovich, real-life protagonist

A key element of  Listy-Letters from the Silenced Country is the inclusion of Andrei Astapovich, a former Belarusian investigator who defected and sought asylum in Poland. Kutsila underscores how vital it was to incorporate a voice from inside the system, someone who chose to break away rather than conform. Developing Andrei ’s story involved years of close collaboration, during which Kutsila learned about the moral dilemmas faced by insiders. He sees Andrei’s example as a testament to the possibility of individual resistance, even in the most oppressive circumstances.

 

Plot